She doesn't know, none of us "RA" civilians do, but these guys stories about "top secret shit" might give us a clue that if you figure it out, they snuff yur azz. These are "John Hutchison" weapons, only a million times more powerful than what ole John was dickin around with. The first vid covers a 1 sq mile weapon in antartica. The other 2 vids are also "tech" worth getting killed over. https://youtu.be/rckecs0PKI4?feature=shared
Umm. First glaring problem. All high rise buildings are made of the same components as thermite. Steel (iron oxide powder) and aluminum (powder). The airplane is also mostly aluminum. Of course you will find thermite residues.
Of course, because the buildings and planes "dustified" and left DUST of steel and aluminum mimicking thermite residues. Cause that's exacly what I learned in metalurgy. .. bahahaha. Clown world theory!
"MAY" do the same thing if you could actually burn a steel highrise. Using a "John Hutchison" device and dustifying a highrise will definately leave residue that appears to be from thermite, but isn't. And I am not opposed to the claim both thermite det cord, explosives, and a "Hutcheson" type device were used. And considering all the melted cars in the area, the "hutcheson" weapon is only common sense. And because the previous 2 attempts on the trade center were unsucessful, it wouldn't surprise me at all if they quadrupled their efforts and trickf#ckery to make #3 the charm. No matter how it went down, it was used to institute the patriot act and other measures flawlesly, yet people still seem to have more concern about how than why, and little concern about what happened to their rights and freedoms removed by the patriot act, patriot II, and all the other draconian "terrorism" bullshii that followed, right up till now. 911 worked like a charm for the globalists, and Silverstiens portfolio.
Evan and his team of lego land clowns, with their big floppy shoes, fire red hair, McD costumes, and big redball noses will disagree with us, lol. Her's for the clowns, bro..... https://substack.com/@911revision/note/c-125831007?r=1nu7su
Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where Did the Towers Go?" which is where my feet have landed in this conundrum ... Then look up John Hutchison from Canada, https://hutchisoneffect.com/
You need to study up. Judy Wood was the only one with a clue besides John Hutcheson, who was one of the original energy weapon tech discoverers. The rest of the A&E truthers are just controlled oposition shills. Isreali art students is the counter intel fairy tail. I suspected both energy weapons and controlled demo for a few years too, but I dug deep. Good luck.
we have photo's Israeli Art Students standing next to fuses for demolition in the World Trade Center and pics of the hall passes they used to move freely around the world trade center complex. Judy Wood has you running around in circles with fairy tail hypothesis.
Dr. J doesn't give the who and hypothesizes the "with what" absolutely zero evidence just speculation about nukes and energy weapons. You have nothing the videos are a waste of time.
We?, ... do you got a turd in your pocket? There is no "WHO", it's a gruop of actors in the shadows, genius, and I just addressed your bullshit photos, and the psyop scam of art students, quit hittin the pipe. Judy wood was just the one person in the group of theorists that had a clue. Theres way more info besides Judy. You're a waste of time if you won't look at other info, so STFU, and quit trollin, cause you got nothing but controlled psyop mainstream "follower" bullshit.
I ran your claims through ChatGPT and got the following response:
1. Hijackers’ passports survived the crash — how could that happen?
• What’s true: One passport (Satam al-Suqami’s) was reportedly found near the World Trade Center site by a passerby before the towers collapsed.
• Context: It’s surprising, but not impossible. In chaotic explosions, some light debris can be ejected outward and survive — there are documented cases of paper and lightweight objects surviving in similar events.
• Conclusion: Unusual, but not implausible. Not proof of conspiracy.
⸻
2. Fire wasn’t hot enough to melt steel beams
• What’s true: Jet fuel fires did not melt the steel beams.
• What’s misunderstood: Steel doesn’t need to melt to fail — it loses around 50% of its strength at 1,100°F (593°C) and 90% at around 1,800°F (982°C).
• The NIST investigation concluded that the fires weakened the steel structure, causing the floors to sag and the towers to collapse.
• Conclusion: Correct that steel didn’t melt, but it didn’t have to. This point is widely misunderstood.
⸻
3. Lack of plane parts at crash sites (WTC and Pentagon)
• What’s true: Plane parts were found at all major crash sites — WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville.
• Photos and FBI reports show recovered engines, landing gear, fuselage, and other debris.
• Claim that plane parts were hidden lacks evidence.
• Conclusion: Plane wreckage was recovered and documented. The claim is false.
⸻
4. Collapse of WTC Building 7 looked like a controlled demolition
• What’s true: WTC 7 collapsed around 5:20 PM, hours after the Twin Towers.
• NIST investigated this thoroughly. It concluded that uncontrolled fires on multiple floors (caused by debris from the North Tower) weakened a critical column, leading to a progressive collapse.
• It was the first known tall steel building collapse primarily due to fire, which is why it looked unusual.
• Conclusion: Strange-looking, yes — but explained by structural failure due to fire. No evidence of explosives.
⸻
5. No plane wreckage at the Pennsylvania crash site, but passports were found
• What’s true: The United Airlines Flight 93 crash in Shanksville created a deep impact crater.
• Wreckage was found, though the plane disintegrated on impact at high speed.
• Human remains, voice recorders, and debris were recovered — and a passport fragment was found.
• Conclusion: This is not accurate — wreckage and human remains were recovered.
⸻
6. Thermite residue found at the WTC site
• What’s claimed: A 2009 paper by Harrit et al. (in a non-peer-reviewed journal) suggested nanothermite might have been present.
• What experts say: The materials described can be explained as common paint primers or construction materials.
• No explosive residue was found by NIST, FEMA, or independent labs.
• Conclusion: No verified evidence of thermite. The claim relies on speculative interpretation of debris.
⸻
7. Survivors heard explosions in the Twin Towers
• What’s true: Many witnesses reported hearing “explosions.”
• In chaotic environments like a collapsing building, explosions can describe a wide range of sounds — including floors pancaking, fuel igniting, or air compression.
• NIST investigated this and found no evidence of timed explosives.
• Conclusion: Explosions were heard, but no evidence they were from bombs. Ambiguous evidence, not proof.
⸻
8. Bin Laden was blamed too quickly; he denied responsibility
• What’s true: Bin Laden initially denied responsibility in early public statements (likely strategic).
• Later, he and other al-Qaeda members claimed responsibility in video statements, and the 9/11 Commission traced funding and planning directly to him.
• U.S. intelligence had prior knowledge of al-Qaeda’s intent, and bin Laden had declared war on the U.S. years earlier.
• Conclusion: Bin Laden did it — and admitted it. The early denial is not unusual in asymmetric warfare.
I hate to be the anti AI guy to say this, but, .... Chat GPT is little more than a ridiculous mockingbird parroting bastardized toy that should be ignored at all costs, and it will be the downfall of those who use and rely on it. Prime example is the new, discredited, AI written MAHA report with so much bullshit it's not even at a "joke" level. ..... Most of that drivel you got there is the "same ole" MSM bullshit line parroted by an electronic component using a program. I couldn't "Homer Simpson" head slap myself hard enough to even get to reading #5, as my time is too valuble to get involved with AI propaganda. ... A few facts interspersed in a cart load of conjecture, baloney, and horse shit. But what do I know, I'm just one of the useless eaters they want to eliminate, and this is just one mans opinion.
Don't forget the politicians wife whom was on one of the planes was able to make a phone call to her senator husband while in flight and at high altitudes. Cels don't work in planes at high altitudes.
Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
9/11 Revisionist presentation: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
9/11 Receipts in a rare book that will cost you $5000
tinyurl.com/ms56wk6f
General Stubblebine
and
Judy Wood
https://youtu.be/JDoCLobUhuc?si=t-swfUXHa9TT-bWL
https://youtu.be/M_pLOvvUpi8?si=pc5wQ6Wl1tv3weeW
Even Judy Wood doesn't believe Judy Wood
Thats gotta be about the stupidest comment on this whole post. Congrats
Who does Dr. J think did it.
She doesn't know, none of us "RA" civilians do, but these guys stories about "top secret shit" might give us a clue that if you figure it out, they snuff yur azz. These are "John Hutchison" weapons, only a million times more powerful than what ole John was dickin around with. The first vid covers a 1 sq mile weapon in antartica. The other 2 vids are also "tech" worth getting killed over. https://youtu.be/rckecs0PKI4?feature=shared
https://youtu.be/8ebGlEFac6k?feature=shared
https://youtu.be/3zm4nh3S66I?feature=shared
Fascinating
Umm. First glaring problem. All high rise buildings are made of the same components as thermite. Steel (iron oxide powder) and aluminum (powder). The airplane is also mostly aluminum. Of course you will find thermite residues.
... the planes were a 3-D psyop, there were no planes, the science doesn't suport the facts. You can't believe your lying eyes.
https://youtu.be/MPKvChFRe0A?feature=shared
ROFLMAO
https://substack.com/@911revision/note/p-135730762?r=1nu7su
Of course, because the buildings and planes "dustified" and left DUST of steel and aluminum mimicking thermite residues. Cause that's exacly what I learned in metalurgy. .. bahahaha. Clown world theory!
Um, no. Thermite produces molten steel and aluminum oxide. Burning a high rise does exactly the same thing.
"MAY" do the same thing if you could actually burn a steel highrise. Using a "John Hutchison" device and dustifying a highrise will definately leave residue that appears to be from thermite, but isn't. And I am not opposed to the claim both thermite det cord, explosives, and a "Hutcheson" type device were used. And considering all the melted cars in the area, the "hutcheson" weapon is only common sense. And because the previous 2 attempts on the trade center were unsucessful, it wouldn't surprise me at all if they quadrupled their efforts and trickf#ckery to make #3 the charm. No matter how it went down, it was used to institute the patriot act and other measures flawlesly, yet people still seem to have more concern about how than why, and little concern about what happened to their rights and freedoms removed by the patriot act, patriot II, and all the other draconian "terrorism" bullshii that followed, right up till now. 911 worked like a charm for the globalists, and Silverstiens portfolio.
Oh there's no question that they were burning. Even in New Zealand watching all afternoon in shock, we knew that.
Judy wood and,911 Alchemy_Facing Reality
Is not control demilition...
Evan and his team of lego land clowns, with their big floppy shoes, fire red hair, McD costumes, and big redball noses will disagree with us, lol. Her's for the clowns, bro..... https://substack.com/@911revision/note/c-125831007?r=1nu7su
When the government tells you 1 thing you can believe the opposite
There were no hijackers.
Qui bono ?
Be careful what you believe. ... I suggest
Dr. Judy Wood's book, "Where Did the Towers Go?" which is where my feet have landed in this conundrum ... Then look up John Hutchison from Canada, https://hutchisoneffect.com/
https://youtu.be/xeUgDJc6AWE?feature=shared
Judy Wood is counter intel fairy tail
You need to study up. Judy Wood was the only one with a clue besides John Hutcheson, who was one of the original energy weapon tech discoverers. The rest of the A&E truthers are just controlled oposition shills. Isreali art students is the counter intel fairy tail. I suspected both energy weapons and controlled demo for a few years too, but I dug deep. Good luck.
we have photo's Israeli Art Students standing next to fuses for demolition in the World Trade Center and pics of the hall passes they used to move freely around the world trade center complex. Judy Wood has you running around in circles with fairy tail hypothesis.
Dr. J doesn't give the who and hypothesizes the "with what" absolutely zero evidence just speculation about nukes and energy weapons. You have nothing the videos are a waste of time.
We?, ... do you got a turd in your pocket? There is no "WHO", it's a gruop of actors in the shadows, genius, and I just addressed your bullshit photos, and the psyop scam of art students, quit hittin the pipe. Judy wood was just the one person in the group of theorists that had a clue. Theres way more info besides Judy. You're a waste of time if you won't look at other info, so STFU, and quit trollin, cause you got nothing but controlled psyop mainstream "follower" bullshit.
Name calling nice sounds as good as conspiracy theorist.
Group of actors in the shadows. Sounds like the road to nowhere which is exactly where they want you to be.
I've got her book and I've seen the Hutchinson video.
Right on! … sounds like you are on the same page as me.
I ran your claims through ChatGPT and got the following response:
1. Hijackers’ passports survived the crash — how could that happen?
• What’s true: One passport (Satam al-Suqami’s) was reportedly found near the World Trade Center site by a passerby before the towers collapsed.
• Context: It’s surprising, but not impossible. In chaotic explosions, some light debris can be ejected outward and survive — there are documented cases of paper and lightweight objects surviving in similar events.
• Conclusion: Unusual, but not implausible. Not proof of conspiracy.
⸻
2. Fire wasn’t hot enough to melt steel beams
• What’s true: Jet fuel fires did not melt the steel beams.
• What’s misunderstood: Steel doesn’t need to melt to fail — it loses around 50% of its strength at 1,100°F (593°C) and 90% at around 1,800°F (982°C).
• The NIST investigation concluded that the fires weakened the steel structure, causing the floors to sag and the towers to collapse.
• Conclusion: Correct that steel didn’t melt, but it didn’t have to. This point is widely misunderstood.
⸻
3. Lack of plane parts at crash sites (WTC and Pentagon)
• What’s true: Plane parts were found at all major crash sites — WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville.
• Photos and FBI reports show recovered engines, landing gear, fuselage, and other debris.
• Claim that plane parts were hidden lacks evidence.
• Conclusion: Plane wreckage was recovered and documented. The claim is false.
⸻
4. Collapse of WTC Building 7 looked like a controlled demolition
• What’s true: WTC 7 collapsed around 5:20 PM, hours after the Twin Towers.
• NIST investigated this thoroughly. It concluded that uncontrolled fires on multiple floors (caused by debris from the North Tower) weakened a critical column, leading to a progressive collapse.
• It was the first known tall steel building collapse primarily due to fire, which is why it looked unusual.
• Conclusion: Strange-looking, yes — but explained by structural failure due to fire. No evidence of explosives.
⸻
5. No plane wreckage at the Pennsylvania crash site, but passports were found
• What’s true: The United Airlines Flight 93 crash in Shanksville created a deep impact crater.
• Wreckage was found, though the plane disintegrated on impact at high speed.
• Human remains, voice recorders, and debris were recovered — and a passport fragment was found.
• Conclusion: This is not accurate — wreckage and human remains were recovered.
⸻
6. Thermite residue found at the WTC site
• What’s claimed: A 2009 paper by Harrit et al. (in a non-peer-reviewed journal) suggested nanothermite might have been present.
• What experts say: The materials described can be explained as common paint primers or construction materials.
• No explosive residue was found by NIST, FEMA, or independent labs.
• Conclusion: No verified evidence of thermite. The claim relies on speculative interpretation of debris.
⸻
7. Survivors heard explosions in the Twin Towers
• What’s true: Many witnesses reported hearing “explosions.”
• In chaotic environments like a collapsing building, explosions can describe a wide range of sounds — including floors pancaking, fuel igniting, or air compression.
• NIST investigated this and found no evidence of timed explosives.
• Conclusion: Explosions were heard, but no evidence they were from bombs. Ambiguous evidence, not proof.
⸻
8. Bin Laden was blamed too quickly; he denied responsibility
• What’s true: Bin Laden initially denied responsibility in early public statements (likely strategic).
• Later, he and other al-Qaeda members claimed responsibility in video statements, and the 9/11 Commission traced funding and planning directly to him.
• U.S. intelligence had prior knowledge of al-Qaeda’s intent, and bin Laden had declared war on the U.S. years earlier.
• Conclusion: Bin Laden did it — and admitted it. The early denial is not unusual in asymmetric warfare.
I hate to be the anti AI guy to say this, but, .... Chat GPT is little more than a ridiculous mockingbird parroting bastardized toy that should be ignored at all costs, and it will be the downfall of those who use and rely on it. Prime example is the new, discredited, AI written MAHA report with so much bullshit it's not even at a "joke" level. ..... Most of that drivel you got there is the "same ole" MSM bullshit line parroted by an electronic component using a program. I couldn't "Homer Simpson" head slap myself hard enough to even get to reading #5, as my time is too valuble to get involved with AI propaganda. ... A few facts interspersed in a cart load of conjecture, baloney, and horse shit. But what do I know, I'm just one of the useless eaters they want to eliminate, and this is just one mans opinion.
https://youtu.be/xeUgDJc6AWE?feature=shared
https://www.drjudywood.com/towers/
AI ... still garbage in garbage out.
Everyone, read Rob Baer's book.
He lives in Telluride CO nowadays but was CIA for decades.
Also: study Alec Station and ABLE DANGER.
And remember there wasn't any real footage of the supposed plane striking the Pentagon. Where were the surveillance cameras that day?
I've seen footage of a missile/drone of some sorts. I guess it just happened to pass by at the time of the crash 😏
Some say it was a bunker buster missile.
Don't forget the politicians wife whom was on one of the planes was able to make a phone call to her senator husband while in flight and at high altitudes. Cels don't work in planes at high altitudes.
That depends on where you actually are in relation to the cell towers. It's certainly not impossible when flying over land.
yes supposedly lots of passengers were using those headrest phones to call people.
Doubtful .....
https://substack.com/@911revision/note/p-135730762?r=1nu7su
You don’t mention the 1400 torched vehicles, most of which were blocks away, and eyewitness reports of vehicles spontaneously exploding.